Title:  Brazil Says Will Not Let Amazon Become 'Sanctuary'  
Source:  Copyright 2001 Reuters
Date:  January 22, 2001  
Byline:  Axel Bugge
 
BRASILIA, Brazil (Reuters) - Brazil on Monday slammed a study warning
of the destruction of at least a quarter of the Amazon due to
development, saying the world's largest rain forest cannot be turned
into an ``untouchable sanctuary.''
 
The country's science and technology ministry said a report on
destruction of the Amazon published in the U.S. journal Science on
Jan. 19 was based on unreliable facts and ``ecological futurology,''
using unfounded projections on deforestation that are challenged by
Brazil's government.
 
``There is a clear perception by the government that we cannot treat
the Amazon as an untouchable sanctuary,'' said a ministry spokesman
defending development. ``There are 20 million Brazilians living
there.''
 
Sometimes considered the lungs of the Earth due to the vast amounts
of oxygen produced there, the Amazon loses an area equivalent to the
size of Rhode Island each year to loggers and other destruction. It
is home to up to 30 percent of the world's animal and plant life and
is seven times the size of France.
 
Developing the Amazon has always been a controversial issue in Brazil
because of the desire to build up the poor northern part of the
country while balancing environmentalists' concerns about keeping the
Amazon intact.
 
The Science article projected that a development plan by the
Brazilian government involving $40 billion in investments over seven
years could result in the destruction of at least a quarter of the
forest by 2020.
 
The article was written by William Laurance of the Smithsonian
Tropical Research Institute, Michigan State University researcher
Mark Cochrane and teams at Oregon State University and the Biological
Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project in Brazil.
 
Laurance said he was surprised by the ministry statement because
``key members of our joint Brazilian-U.S. research team'' were part
of a joint research project of Brazil's National Institute of
Amazonian Research and the Smithsonian Institution.
 
``I don't see how any reasonable person could easily dismiss our
findings,'' he said, adding the comments were coming from a ''single
Brazilian ministry, not the government per se.''
 
But the ministry said Laurance's work ``does not reflect the
technical consensus at these institutions.''
 
Embassy Objects To Article As Well
 
And the Brazilian Embassy in Washington issued a statement saying
some information in the article was the ``object of considerable
controversy among the scientific community.''
 
``The projection by Professor Laurance does not seem to have a sound
basis since it takes into account the experience of the last 25 years
when none of the different policies (to stop deforestation) now
adopted were in place,'' the embassy said.
 
The article said if the project's plans to build more roads in the
Amazon become reality and result in an expected increase in
activities like mining and farming, the forest would be greatly
threatened.
 
The optimistic scenario predicted 28 percent of the Amazon would be
destroyed or heavily damaged while the pessimistic scenario forecast
42 percent.
 
The ministry said absolute worst case scenario would see only 25
percent of the total Amazon destroyed by 2020.