Title: Copyright 2001 Inter Press ServiceSource: Environment: NGOs Battle for Papua New Guinea's ForestsDate: January 26, 2001Byline: By Gumisai MutumeEnvironmental groups have embarked on a campaign to block the releaseof the second disbursement of loans for Papua New Guinea's structuraladjustment program.The groups, led by Greenpeace Pacific and Papua New Guinea's EcoForestry Forum, fear that the release of the loans coupled with theapproval by the World Bank of the country's Forest and ConservationProject (FCP) will contribute to the destruction of its forests, theworld's third largest tropical rainforests.Conditions attached to a $ 90 million structural adjustment loan(SAL) in 1999 require the country to impose a moratorium on newlogging concessions until a full review of existing concessions iscarried out. The country already has nearly half of its accessibleforests committed to industrial logging. NGOs say some 30 proposedtimber projects threaten most of the rest.Lafcadio Cortesi of Greenpeace Pacific says the Bank would bebacksliding on its commitments to forest conservation if it releasesthe second tranche of the adjustment loan because the forestry reviewhas not been completed.The moratorium was intended to facilitate a review of existingproblems in the sector and to allow for the implementation ofreforms."Once this (loan release) is done, the government of Papua New Guinea(PNG) is likely to ignore the moratorium and begin final clearing ofone of the world's last great rainforests," says Cortesi. "The WorldBank and PNG government are poised to make decisions that may lead tothe unleashing of bulldozers, which will swiftly carry out the finaldismantling of PNG's large and contiguous forest wilderness."NGOs want the moratorium to remain in force until adequate policieshave been designed and implemented, "and the Forestry Act,regulations and guidelines, as well as Forest Authority processes andstructures, are updated to legitimize and make fully accessiblesmall-scale eco-forestry management," notes the campaign's sign-onletter seeking broader NGO support in opposing the Bank loan.The Bank recently supported the production of a document entitledForest Strategies for Community-Based Forestry and Conservation inPapua New Guinea, which recommends that government revise theNational Forest Policy to fully recognize eco-forestry and small-scale and medium-scale logging.The report recommends a wide range of forest conservation measuresaimed at upgrading the status of eco-forestry. It calls for theupdating of logging maps clearly showing current and plannedconservation areas, fragile forest types, areas of threatened orrestricted plants and animal species and important water catchmentsnot available for logging.But there are fears that under continued pressure from governmentofficials and renegade officials within the National ForestAuthority, the moratorium will be undermined and the remainingaccessible rainforests allocated for commercial harvesting.According to California-based independent consultant Dana Clark, whomonitors the policies of the international financial institutions,NGOs are worried about compliance with the original conditions of theadjustment loan "and we are concerned about the upcoming, not-yet-approved Forest and Conservation Project (FCP) loan."During the last few years the Bank has been developing the FCP,originally intended to broaden the types of forest managementpractised in the country, located in the southwestern Pacific Ocean,north of Australia and east of Indonesia.Several meetings attended by Bank officials, government and non-governmental representatives established a critical need for a forestpolicy and guidelines for more ecologically sustainable, small tomedium scale, community-based forestry operations."In a startling and inexcusable turnaround, these elements wereremoved late into project development on the justification that otherdonors were covering them," notes the NGO campaign document. "This ispatently false."The European Union and Australian AID, the other major donors in thesector are providing small-scale support to community-based projects,but do not have programs to reform the Forestry Act or the ForestAuthority.The present forest allocation process in the nation of 4.5 millionpeople remains biased towards large-scale intensive management forlog- export by foreign companies, critics charge.Studies carried out by the WorldWide Fund for Nature (WWF) in PapuaNew Guinea show that despite the moratorium being in place, theForest Authority has continued to process several areas in order tobring them to tender and allocation. WWF specifically identifies twoconcessions -- Amanab Blocks 1 to 4 and Sembo as having been put topublic tender after the establishment of the moratorium.In a November 1999 budget speech, the country's prime minister MekereMorauta conceded that "governance has been particularly poor in thearea of forestry, with the side effect of promoting corrupt practicesand undermining environmental sustainability in logging activities."The new government in PNG came to power in July 1999 pledging tostabilize macro-economic conditions, improve the transparency andgovernance of public institutions and restore relations with theinternational financial institutions.Morauta pledged his government's commitment to a moratorium on allnew forestry licenses, extensions and conversions, "and to proceedwith a review of all existing licenses, to ensure that properprocedure is followed, that logging practices are not carried out inan unsustainable way and that landowners get their fair share ofbenefits from resource use."A decision by the Bank's board on the FCP and the disbursement of thesecond tranche of Papua New Guinea's SAL could come in a few weeks.Officials at the Bank's external relations department declined tocomment on the status of the project saying an announcement would bemade in due course.For more information:Papua New Guinea Rainforest Conservation & Sustainable DevelopmentPortal - http://forests.org/pngforest.htmlURGENT ACTION ALERT: World Bank and Papua New Guinea Government Setto Abandon Forest Conservation Goals -http://forests.org/emailaction/png_jan_2001.htmWorld Bank Sign-On Letter, re: Forest Conservation Backsliding -http://forests.org/recent/2001/pngwbsio.htm